Friendship honesty Essay Research Paper Example

Friendship honesty Essay Paper Friendship can be defined as the common relationship that occurs between two persons. It is created when one is experiencing comfort and emotionally safe when sharing his/her ideas with the other. For one to be called a friend. so that individual should be in a place of demoing a better apprehension of the other and besides assures him or her to be by his or her side in every emotional crisis. There are many properties that are considered to construct true friendly relationship ; in this essay we consider three properties. First. friendly relationship is based on trust no affair any obstructions on the manner. Friendship means that there exists honestness between the parties. Finally. friendly relationship means that the parties are non self-seekers. When friends trust each other. it means that at any clip that one friend falls in problem the other will assist without holding a 2nd idea. One should be free in the sharing of secrets and emotions without any fright of being betrayed. When friends trust each other. one is able to offer pieces of advice and protection to the other when faced with challenges in hard state of affairss. In friendly relationship. people will be able to portion their exposures with their friends because they believe in each other that no 1 should take advantage of the openness. We will write a custom essay sample on Friendship honesty Essay specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Friendship honesty Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Friendship honesty Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Some of the elements associated with trust are good company. love. good resonance. relaxation. and comfort when together in all fortunes. Finally. if friends trust each other. so one will be able to foretell what the other is capable of making when any state of affairs might originate Friendship means that honestness prevails at all times. This means that the friends should be positive to each other and besides should present properties such as truthfulness and downrightness in any state of affairs. Friends should non move in any mode that demonstrates any signifier of misgiving. lying. cheating and even larceny of any sort. Honesty in friendly relationship means that the friends will state the truth about any action taken. being sincere. carnival. honest. and loyal towards the care of their relationship. When friends are honest to each other. one should be able to state another the negative properties possessed by him or her and seek to do the state of affairs better. Honesty in friendly relationship is besides created when there is a bond and trust created between the parties such that there is an unconditioned openness created in every person. Friendship is non based on self-seekers. This means that the friendly relationship is non created for the intent of holding something malicious to derive from the relationship. True friendly relationship fundamentally portrays altruism ; one should non see the other as taking advantage of him or her after set uping a relationship. In true friendly relationship. a relationship is created where people trust and love one another unconditionally. One should non take advantage of the other when problem overcomes another. Opportunists run off when the benefits flicker off. but true friendly relationship does non establish their relationship on stuff facets but on the emotional and psychological foundations. Therefore. friendly relationship is the lone relationship that is able to travel through hard state of affairss and fortunes. It is cemented on neutrality and unconditioned demands. Due to the fondness. trueness. regard. love. trust. honestness. and non-opportunists. friends are able to make a strong bond that brings together people in the society. This will promote the persons to hold good moral behaviour in the society as a consequence of all the specific qualities of friendly relationship.

Summary Analysis of Ray Bradburys The Last Night of the World Essays

Summary Analysis of Ray Bradburys The Last Night of the World Essays Summary Analysis of Ray Bradburys The Last Night of the World Paper Summary Analysis of Ray Bradburys The Last Night of the World Paper Daniel S. Meltzer Professor Bridget Bell English 121 07 October 2013 The Unanswered Mysteries of the End of the World Throughout the book The Last Night of the World by Ray Bradbury, there are a lot of vague generalizations that are left unanswered. Ray Bradbury is known for his descriptive literature and vast amounts of emotion and mystery; most of which is never completely understood by the reader. Ray Bradbury is well known for his articulate literature as he often portrays thorough coherency throughout his stories. Modern day literature is straight to the point and easy to understand but Bradbury is ot only able to connect his stories to real world events but he also engages the reader by personally connecting his literature in a way the reader never would truly understand. I plan to summarize and analyze Ray Bradburys, The Last Night of the World to help readers better comprehend his style of literature; a style that directly relates to the real world and to his readers While reading The Last Night of the World by Ray Bradbury, there was an evident pattern throughout that tells the story of what it may be like during the end of the world. But, throughout the book, the story portrayed is a story completely different from what most readers would expect. In the beginning, Ray Bradbury starts the story off by asking two questions. The reader is then more engaged in the reading as asking a question allows the reader to think and helps boost the readers interest in the story; helps make the reader want to read on. Ray Bradbury then proceeds onward as if the main character was answering the question that was asked in the beginning. If an author asks a question, it is usually rhetorical and not meant to be nswered; this is interesting as most stories do not start off the way it has started off. Through the beginning of the story, The Last Night of the World, two characters whose names are never disclosed (which is another interesting part of the story) are talking about what they would do if it were the last night of the world. Well, in the story, it is the last night of the world and is an interesting topic to write about as the end of the world has always intrigued others and has always had people wondering, what would it be like if it were the end of the world? Ray Bradbury continues his riting by asking rhetorical questions such as: how would the world end or why the world would end but those questions are never actually answered. Rather than answering the questions, Bradbury expands on the thoughts and brings out details that most people would not bother thinking about. He also writes as if the story were an onion, peeling back the layers one by one and slowing getting to the middle rather than cutting right into the onion [story] and answering all of the questions at once. Towards the middle of the story, the characters sit down to have a cup of coffee to iscuss how the world would end and after they continue to live as if they normally couple) go about their evening cooking dinner, washing the dishes and then, at the end of the story, tucking themselves into bed and shutting the lights out as if they will wake up tomorrow and everything will be okay. But, Ray Bradbury never explains why he wrote the way he did or exactly why the characters went about their lives as if it was not the end of the world. Most skeptics would believe the end of the world would be hectic and crazy. Not only that but it would be emotional with everyone unning around like crazed people and doing things that some would never imagine themselves doing. So, the real question is why he wrote the way he did and the reasons behind his writing. The next paragraphs will analyze the reasons behind his writing. Ray Bradbury, growing up in the 1920s and 1930s, probably faced financial struggles through not only the great depression but as well as the three famous Wall Street stock market crashes and other worldwide financial market failures. Although finances doesnt directly correlate with the end of the world but it connects in a way ome may not understand. Losing money drives people crazy which are similar to the end of the world; whereas people would be going crazy to get things done and to do things they need to do before they pass. Not only this but most people will come to think about the end of the world and most people will Just believe the end of the world will be hectic and crazy; as is the story by Ray Bradbury. Now, why would Ray Bradbury write the way he did. Although Ray Bradbury had passed in mid-2012, he is no longer alive to tell the stories himself, leaving his legacy lose by him and pressuring those close to him to pass on the stories of his life. In todays world, most people are obsessed with perfection and most people get more bored than they did 50 years ago. But, Ray Bradbury still writes as you would find a book in the General Store, back in the 1940s. Most authors nowadays get straight to the point and if they dont, they often find a way to keep the reader entertained with adventurous or mysterious details. But, instead, Bradbury finds a way to engage the reader by asking questions, throwing interesting twists into his stories and telling tories most authors would never even think about writing. Literature is all about creativity as William Shakespeare never earned the worlds greatest writer ego by writing about a tomato and peach or about a farmer on a farm. In order to be successful, your writing has to be unique from all the rest and without the uniqueness; the reader would never be engaged. If a reader reads something they have read before, it would be more boring to them then it would if they were reading it for the first time. Originality is always what the reader is looking forward to and ometimes, an author has to put him or herself in the readers shoes (to think about what the reader truly wants to read and what they would not) and that is exactly what Bradbury did. That is what made Ray Bradbury such a legend, his uniqueness and relativity in his literature, not the originality and common practice. Creativity is what everyone looks for and what readers continue to look for, whether they are reading a book from 1920, 2013 or even 30 years from now; it is what will make a legend. As the great Babe Ruth would put it, theres Heroes and theres legends. Heroes get remembered, but legends never die. As you can now tell, Ray Bradburys writing is legendary. Not only that but he writing with the real world through personal events and issues; through personal thoughts and imagination. Although Ray Bradbury was able to connect to the reader and to his or her mind, his writing is known to be the most creative and innovative than any other author. Ray Bradbury had passed on in 2012 but through his life, his stories and how he portrays his real life experiences, his literature and his soul will live on forever.

The Boer War Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

The Boer War - Research Paper Example Compared to the British troops, the Boers were not as disciplined and organized; they had no set uniform, and as soon as a confrontation broke out, they immediately gathered up to form a unit and elected a commander. The Boer troops had no proper uniforms or weapons and vastly depended on hunting guns in order to launch an offensive against the well-equipped British troops. Their weapons included field guns and pistols, and they were also armed with shotguns; most of the Boer troops often traveled with at least 8 days of supplies. Unlike the British troops, their marksmanship was not the result of intense training regimes, but was learned through experience. The Boers were not soldiers but mere hunters or farmers that earned them the name ‘Boer’. The people had no real access to ammunitions either, and when they ran out of proper weapons, they usually relied on stealing or capturing the weapons of the British.The British had realized that the only way they could subdue t heir opponent was by attacking their formation and not their position; which meant that they were trying to cut off their access to their supplies. Any sort of siege had seemed pointless for their excellent marksmanship that made any sort of progression towards their base completely pointless. They even had their ranges marked out with white stones and fired according to them and soon the British troops were ordered to avoid going near white stones on the ground.  Ã‚   Since the South Africans were devout Christians, many of the people did not believe.